The law firm of Bisnar | Chase is dedicated to each client receiving the absolute best legal representation possible.
The cases set forth below are a sampling of results achieved for our California Auto Accident clients. This is a partial list and does not constitute a promise of any kind. Please remember that these cases and the results achieved were determinant on many factors and results differ from case to case depending on the circumstances particular to each instance.
| $1,425,000 | Auto accident caused by dangerous
condition left on freeway by CalTrans (State of California) contractors
resulting in the death of two teenagers. |
| $1,250,000+ | Auto vs auto accident which included
a failure of client’s (the driver) restraint system (seat
belt anchor). Within fifty days of being hired and through the diligence
and tenacity of the law firm’s staff, insurance policies were
located and policy limit settlements were arranged. (this was partially
due our reputation with the insurance companies and their attorneys).
We are now proceeding against Nissan Motors on the products liability
claim and seeking punitive damages. The seat belt anchor system
was designed so weak that it evidenced “a conscience disregard”
for the safety of the seat belt user. |
| $1,000,000+ | Auto vs. Auto accident with two spinal
surgeries. Collected defendant driver’s policy limit. Won
a binding arbitration award for the policy maximum from the injured
tow truck driver’s employer’s insurance company. Settled
an “insurance bad faith” lawsuit against the employer’s
auto insurance company for their failure to fairly handle the initial
uninsured motorist claim costing the client nearly a year time delay
in a resolution and costing him additional attorney’s fees
and costs to prosecute the binding arbitration. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Products Liability case against
Daimler Chrysler Motor Company and the rental car agency that rented
a 15-passenger van to a group of friends going from Los Angeles
to Las Vegas for a birthday party. The fifteen passenger, Ram 350,
van rolled over, roof crushed, seat belts failed and passengers
ejected. Multiple deaths and serious injuries. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Products Liability
case against Ford Motor Company and the rental car agency that rented
a 15-passenger van to a church group traveling from Southern California
to Northern California for a church function. The fifteen passenger,
F350, van rolled over, roof crushed, seat belts failed and passengers
ejected. Multiple deaths and serious injuries. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Products Liability case against
Ford Motor Company and the maker of a failed seatbelt, TRW. Negligence
case against U-Haul the renter of the truck that caused the accident
for negligent maintenance and failing to instruct the driver. Auto
vs. Auto negligence case against the driver of the U-Haul truck.
A minor child was paralyzed and eventually died as a result of a
three vehicle collision involving two Ford Explorers, both rolled-over,
a seat belt failure (false latching) and the failure of the roof
of one of the Explorers. Driver injured due to roof crush. |
| $3 Million+ | Motorcycle vs. Auto Accident. Client’s
previous attorney insisted that client settle case for the $15,000
policy limit of the negligent auto driver. Case was eventually settled
for cash up front, an annuity (a stream of guaranteed payments for
life) and payment of the workers’ compensation insurance reimbursement
rights. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Products Liability case against
General Motors for the roll over and roof crush of a Tahoe resulting
in the death of the driver and a passenger. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Products Liability case against
Ford Motor Company for failure of front seat system which resulted
in the death of a child rear seat passenger in a 30 mile an hour
rear end impact auto accident. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Product Liability case against General Motors for the death of an adult daughter killed when the roof of Chevrolet pickup crushed during a roll over accident in Mexico. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Product Liability case against
General Motors for seat belt failure in a Chevrolet pickup resulting
in a passenger being thrown through the front windshield when the
truck went into a ditch. Concussion and facial scaring. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Product Liability case against
Susiki Motors. Winds caused driver to lose control of Susiki Samuri
resulting in the Samuri rolling over and killing a teenage passenger. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto Product Liability case against
General Motors for roof failure (roof crushed in on driver) and
against a brake shop for brake failure in a Chevrolet pickup. Driver
sustaining a spinal injury when the truck’s brakes failed
and the truck went off the side of a mountain road and the roof
crushed in on the driver’s head. |
| $520,000 | Auto accident where building materials
from freeway construction site hit plaintiff’s car. CalTrans
freeway construction contractor initially denied liability. Extensive
discovered uncovered a cover up of evidence by the CalTrans contractor
who then settled just before trial. |
| $750,000 | Auto vs. Auto accident. Collected
total of defendant’s insurance and then arbitrated client’s
uninsured motorist claim. Her insurance company insisted that she
was not entitled to the full policy limit until moments before starting
the binding arbitration with the threat of an insurance bad faith
case hanging over their heads. |
| $500,000 | Auto vs. Auto, clients previous attorney
recommended settling for less than $200,000 after a surgery. Uninsured
motorist claim settled for $650,000 with questionable causation
and injuries plus recover from defendant driver. |
| Confidential Settlement | Auto vs. Auto accident. Defendant
was uninsured. Client’s uninsured motorist insurance carrier
refused to pay her claim. We won a policy limit award at the uninsured
motorist arbitration. Due to her insurance companies “bad
fath” and negligence in handling her claim, we sued the insurance
company. The “bad faith” claim was settled for a “confidential
amount”. |
| $300,000 | Auto vs. Auto accident. This elderly
client had been represented by former attorney for over six months.
We took over representation, conducted our investigation, gathered
the evidence, made her claim and settled it for policy limits, twenty
times more than she was expecting, in less than two months from
beginning her representation. |
| $300,000 | Road design defect against CalTrans. |
| $300,000 | Auto vs. Pedestrian. Defense contended
that our client was negligent in “J” walking, stepping
out into the street in the face of an on coming vehicle and was
attempting to commit suicide when he stepped into the street. The
defense settled for their policy limit rather than risk us winning
an even greater amount at trial. |
| $292,000 | Wrongful death auto accident. |
| $200,000 | Auto vs. Parked Commercial vehicle.
Death of daughter passenger in auto that ran into illegally parked
semi-truck. Parents refused to accept settlement offered during
trial which was Multiple times higher. |
| $165,000 | Auto vs. Auto accident. |
| $150,000 | Auto vs. Auto - surgery. |
| $150,000 | Auto vs. Auto - policy limit. |
| $145,000 | Auto vs. Auto accident. Settled for
total of multiple auto insurance policies that we were able to discover
and then “stack”. |
| $140,000 | Auto vs Auto. Settled auto claim on
behalf of injured party for the $100,000 policy limit and then collected
$40,000 additional for family member who was traumatized by witnessing
injury (Dillon claim). |
| $137,000 | Auto vs. Pedestrian. |
| $125,000 | Auto vs. Auto - surgery |
| $109,000 | Auto vs. Auto |
| $108,000 | Auto vs. Auto |
| $100,000 | Auto vs Auto accident, policy limit.
We have many dozens of case histories of $100,000 policy limit recoveries.
Our systematic approach to cases in general and auto accident cases
particularly, positions our client’s to recover policy limits
by exposing the defendant’s insurance company to a judgment
potential in excess of the policy limit, in which case they would
be forced to pay the entire judgment, regardless of their policy
maximum limits. |
| $100,000 | Auto vs. Pedestrian, policy limit. |
| $100,000 | Auto vs. Auto, policy limit. |
| $100,000 | On-the-job auto vs. auto accident,
policy limit. |
| $100,000 | Auto vs. Auto -surgery recommended,
policy limit. |
| $100,000 | Auto vs. Auto, $1,200 property damage
to plaintiff’s vehicle. Previous attorney insisted that client
settle for the $7,500 being offered by defense insurance company. |
| $100,000 | Auto vs. Auto, policy limit. |
| $100,000 | Auto vs. Auto, policy limit on both
third party and under insured motorist policy. |
| $93,703 | Auto vs. Auto. $500 in property damage.
Exposed policy limit and insurance company was forced to pay entire
judgment, which was in excess of the auto insurance policy limit. |
| $75,000 | Auto vs. Auto - Major pre-existing
injuries. |
| $75,000 | Auto vs. Auto. |
| $70,000 | Auto vs. Auto, meniscus surgery. |
| $56,000 | Auto vs. Auto accident - meniscus
surgery. |
| Confidential Settlement | Insurance “Bad Faith”
against UNIUM and Provident Insurance. UNIUM, Provident Insurance refused to continue disability payments after the insured had been injured in an auto accident. Federal Court. |
| $825,000+ | Bus vs. Pedestrian on-the-job injury.
Concussion. Settlement also included Metro Link pay additional funds
to reimburse workers’ compensation insurance company. |
© 2008 Bisnar | Chase California Personal Injury Lawyers - California Auto Accident Lawyers - California Car Accident Injury Lawyers - serving Los Angeles County, Orange County, San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Inland Empire and Ventura. Also serving Nevada car accident injury victims. All rights reserved.
Web Site Marketing by: SLS Consulting - Lawyer, Attorney, Law Firm and Legal
Web Sites
Links • Sitemap • Home
